The Arc’teryx Bora Mid One Million Step Review: 731,174 Step Update

The 1,000,000 Step Review has moved on! Find the 1,000,876 step update HERE.

Or read on to the 713,174 step update below.


This is my son, Jack.

_DSC1435

I’ve been thinking a lot about him lately. At 17 months old he is entering the most exciting time of his life– old enough to understand how things work, but young enough that every single thing is glittering and new. He can spend hours, days really (assuming we take breaks for the all-important nap and snack times), exploring and discovering. So, he runs through the world discovering new things, naming new things, eyes shining with the thrill of seeing something you have never seen before. It is beautiful and endearing, the kind of thing that gives you hope for the future.

Some of us lose this as we get older, as the thrill of discovering the sun is replaced with the knowledge there is nothing new under it. We are let down when “new” ideas turn out to be re-treads and slowly we gravitate toward the things we already know. Yet, even we old cynics can be surprised once in a while. And, when we are lucky enough stumble upon something new, something genuinely different, that child like wonder can quickly bubble back up. Next thing you know, you are a kid again, smiling wide as you remember that the world is neat and things really can change.

All of which is a long way of getting to the point of this review: I’ve been wearing the Arc’teryx Bora Mids for nearly three-quarters of a million steps now, they are new, they are genuinely different, and they are incredible.


_DSC5783

Simply put, Arc’teryx footwear is just different from all the hiking shoes that came before it. First, some of the shoes in Arc’teryx’s line are actually two separate shoes: 1.) A tough outer, and 2.) A removable inner which can be changed out for different conditions (e.g., insluated, waterproof, etc.). This design choice has been the focus of nearly all the press surrounding these shoes (for example, HERE, HERE, andHERE); however, I believe this is a red herring. The thing that really gives these boots the potential to be special is that the outer boot is made of a laminate that is simultaneously much tougher and much lighter than leather.

Arc’teryx believes that these changes will will fundamentally alter our expectations of hiking footwear. That’s big talk. To test that claim I (or rather, my wife Angie, HAPPY FATHERS DAY TO ME!) plunked down $300ish dollars and hit the trail with a brand new pair of Bora Mids.

There is a fundamental problem with the way shoe reviews work: because reviewers have to handle a huge number of shoes per year, they really only get to test out their shoes for a short period of time. In this way reviews at places like Backpacker (where, full disclosure, I have done a little bit of writing) are really something more like unboxings and first takes. Enter our 1,000,000 step review.

The 1,000,000 step review is actually spread out across multiple reviews. First I do an unboxing and quick take, which you can find HERE. That segment covers out of box fit and finish, goes over specific features of the boots, and gives many many more details on the removable inner-boot system. I really suggest you read it. Then, I do periodic updates around 250,000, 500,000, and 750,000 steps. The 250,000ish step update is HERE and the 500,000ish step update is HERE. Again, I really suggest you read along because I won’t rehash all the details every time. Just in case that isn’t your jam…


STEPS 1-514,061 SUMMARY:  

WHY DID I PICK THESE INSTEAD OF THOSE WITH REMOVABLE INNER: Arc’teryx makes these boots with both removable and non-removable liners, with the removable liner model costing an additional $50-150 depending on where you purchase. The liners themselves are supposed to make the boot more flexible, allowing you to choose the amount of insulation necessary for the conditions, but are only available Gore-Tex and Insulated models. I live in Arizona where I will never need an insulated inner, and (as of this writing) Arc’teryx is not selling the non-waterproof liner I would actually use. So, I elected to save the money and get the simpler boot.

OUT-SOLE QUALITY: Much stronger and thicker than other boots in its class (e.g., Salomon Quest 4D, Lowa Renegade, etc.)

IN-SOLE QUALITY: Terrible, immediately replaced with superfeet green.

WATERPROOFING: At 514,061 steps no sign of leaking

LOOKS: Pure-sex. I don’t even mind wearing them in public.

STEPS 1-514,061 CONCLUSION: Great, but I wish they had offered a non-waterproof inner boot.

On to the update!


COMFORT

_DSC6887

From the 294,853 step update:

In the first review, I mentioned that these boots were comfortable. What I did not realize at that time is that the laminate material that makes up the outer continues to break in more slowly than comparable nubuck leather boots. As such, these boots, which were already comfortable to begin with, have broken in even more to become an almost perfect mold for my feet. The minimal heel slipping that was apparent in the beginning is gone, the annoying clicking sound these boots can make when they are first worn is gone, and the general sense of clunckiness that came with such a stiff pair of boots when first worn is gone. By combining the out of box wearability of light hikers, and the made for your foot feeling of well broken in full grain leather uppers, these boots once, again, combine the best features of both worlds of hiking footwear.

Not to toot our own horn too much, but this type of observation is exactly what makes an extended review valuable– some of the early reviews noted that these boots did not live up to their expectations from a comfort perspective, but with the boot-hours I have logged I have to believe that these reviewers just underestimated the fact that these boots, unlike others in their class, get better with time.

And the 514,061 step update:

I am going to sound like a broken record here, but these boots have continued to get better with time. From generally comfortable out of the box to wonderful at 300,00 steps, these boots feel like they were made for me at 500,000 steps. They are the most comfortable shoes, not just boots, I have ever worn, but it took a while to get there.

At 731,174 steps these boots continue to surprise. Somehow they keep getting more comfortable. Because I have strangely shaped heels, I always have to do serious lace locking to keep my heels in place. Over the last testing period I realized that these boots had so perfectly formed to me that I no longer have to. It’s wonderful.


WATERPROOFING

_DSC6621

As I mentioned in my initial review, one of my great disappointments with the Bora system is that Arc’teryx has elected not to release non-water proof liners. This might sound silly because everyone wants dry feet, and waterproof shoes seem like a surefire way to keep your feet dry. However, as Andrew Skurka points out in his seminal piece on the topic, one of the problems with waterproof breathable membranes (like the Gore-Tex used on these boots) is that every material will fail eventually, and when waterproof breathable membranes fail they not only let water in, but inhibit the ability of water to move out.

In initial testing the Bora Mids performed flawlessly, keeping my feet completely dry despite being fully submerged in water for 15 minutes. However, last weekend, after two days in boggy conditions, of Mt. Baldy my feet, especially the right foot, began to feel wet. To confirm that the leak was not the result of water wicking down my soaked legs into the socks, I repeated my full 30 minute submersion test.

Both boots leaked directly over the “pinky” toe. The right boot in particular leaked far worse than the left, confirming what I felt on Baldy.

What does this mean? Well, that’s actually a really interesting question.

For one, let’s compare start by comparing the Bora Mid to the competition. I maintain that the natural born enemy of the Bora Mid is the Solmon Quest 4D. Every pair of Solomon Quest 4Ds I have owned (and there have been many) have leaked right out the box. Every. Single. Pair. Looking away from Solomon, the pair of Lowa Renegades I loved so much that I wore down to the midsoles leaked within six months of owning them. The Boras held up to a comparatively strong 500,000+ steps. This is speculation, but I am confident that the Bora Mids did better than anything else they are competing against would.

Second, though these leaks are annoying they are not catastrophic. Remember that the pictures above show my feet after 30 minutes fully submerged in water. This is an admittedly extreme test, and as these boots transition from being “completely waterproof” to “a little leaky” they will still protect your feet from the conditions the vast majority of the conditions hikers face most of the time– rain, snow, and dew. Or, put another way, if you don’t want to get your feet wet don’t stand in the stream for 30 minutes.

Last, you could see this as a reason to step up from the Bora Mid to the Bora2 Mid, which utilize replaceable liners. This would play to the modular promise of the Bora line, as when the Gore-Tex liners wore out you would just replace them. But this too requires a little introspection. Using Amazon pricing as a guide, here are the costs of such a proposition:

Bora Mid (size 11.5):  $199.94

Bora2 Mid (size 11.5):  $328.25

Difference: $128.31

Replacement Liner: $95.00

Difference w/Liner: $223.31

*Pricing as of 8/30/16

So you could buy an an entirely new pair of boots, complete with fresh soles, outers, and eyelets, for the price of upgrading from the Bora to the Bora2 and replacing the liners when they wear out. This might be worth it if Arc’teryx also offered non-waterproof, fully breathable liners for the Bora2 as well, making the system truly flexible, but until then buying the Bora2 only make sense if you life in a cold climate where the insulation matters.

So what are we left with? The Boras have performed admirably in the department of waterproofing, outlasting any competing design I have experience with. The leak they developed is not horrendous, and I have only noticed it in extreme scenarios. 750,000ish steps in I am sure they would do fine in the rain and snow, which is what most people buy waterproof boots for in the first place.

However, they do leak because all waterproof boots will leak with enough wear. And when they do leak, all the water that gets in has trouble getting out. This is the fundamental flaw of waterproof footwear, and, despite their best efforts, Arc’teryx doesn’t seem to have figured out a way around it.


OUTER and SOLE DURABILITY

To set the stage: I live in Phoenix, I hike all summer, and I generally train with a 50ish lb pack on the local mountain preserves. Even worse, I am a heavier guy (190 lbs) and I supinate really badly, placing all the wear one one side of the outsole. If I get bored, sometimes I’ll run a little bit with the pack on. All together this means I eat through boots. In 2013 I ripped lugs off the outsole on 2 pairs of Salomon Quest 4Ds (including one in less than 3 hikes!), one pair of Salomon Comet 3Ds, and one pair of Lowa Renegades. People like me haunt the dreams of boot designers everywhere.

731,174 steps in, lets look at the boots:

IMG_20160901_054705IMG_20160901_054745IMG_20160901_054752IMG_20160901_054804IMG_20160901_054810

Incredible. Absolutely incredible. The only boots I have had hold up this well are the absurdly heavy Asolo TPS 520.

I will mention that my brother in law has the same boots and his have developed wear points on the outer shell, right at the ball of the foot. He wears his boots quite loose compared to me, so my working hypothesis is that the extra flex in his step is putting too much pressure on the outer. My pair, despite lots of wear in really terrible conditions, show no similar wear signs.

That being said, durability is the area where Arc’teryx’s decision to use laminate pays dividends. Usually durability comes at the cost of weight. However, relative to leather, laminate is both lighter and tougher. What more, because the weight savings on the upper are so great, Arc’teryx could use a stronger, more durable, heavier outsole than the competition and still end up with a lighter overall boot. All together this means you get the toughness of a hardcore, classic backpacking boot (e.g., Asolo TPS 520, Danner Mountain Light, etc.) with the weight comparable to the lightweight boot champion, the Solomon Quest 4D.


CONCLUSION

A serious question: if lighter, faster, grippy-er shoes can get you to places like this…

_DSC8847

…while still being strong enough to support you and your pack, then what is the point of boots, anyways?

I am not the first person to ask this question. Actually, I’m probably a decade or so late. For years boots have been slipping in popularity as serious hikers move towards trail runners. Shoes have gotten better, loads lighter, distances longer, and (most importantly) we have gotten tougher. When facing the vastness of the PCT or the non-stop walking of an Arizona Death March, ounces matter and boots weigh many ounces. What more, as these trail runners began to populate the REI shelves, weekend warriors realized they did not need to lug around boots for their few 5 mile hikes a year. To continue to exist boots needed to change.

And change is what Arc’teryx has done here. The Bora Mids are a fundamental transition in boot design, a complete rethinking of what materials can be used to make a boot. By transitioning from leather to laminate Arc’teryx have created a boot that is lighter than other “light” boots, stronger than trail runners, equally as durable as boots that are heavier, and still comfortable enough to rack up huge miles.

Of course, there are quibbles. Break in is long. The provided insoles are terrible. I wish the waterproofing were infinitely durable and infinitely breathable. But quibbles these are. To continue to be useful boots must prove themselves better at something that shoes. They must be more durable, they must provide more support, and they must remain light enough not to be a hinderance. The Bora Mids do all of this and more. These aren’t just good boots, they are an example what boots should be, what boots will have to be if they are going to make it in a world of ever longer, ever faster hikes.


Did you miss parts one, two, and three? Read them HEREHERE, and HERE.


Want to buy them? Try these links: 

Please support Lesser Places and purchase them using these links for MEN’S or WOMEN’S.  For the removable inner Bora2 Mids click here for MEN’S or WOMEN’S. Women’s models are not available through Amazon at this time, and the provided link takes you directly to Arc’teryx, which has no affiliation with Lesser Places.


See them in action: 

_DSC1520

_DSC7809

_DSC7816

_DSC0014

_DSC9452

_DSC9578

_DSC9662

_DSC6598

_DSC6887

_DSC5971

_DSC5940

_DSC5888

_DSC6045

_DSC6076


Cool memories from when they were on my feet:_DSC9602

_DSC9665

_DSC9688

_DSC9075

_DSC9081-2

_DSC9507

_DSC6653

_DSC6214

_DSC7747

_DSC7780

_DSC0557

_DSC0541

_DSC1571

_DSC6138



Disclaimer: This post, and all posts on LesserPlaces, may contain affiliate links– links that allow me to receive a small kickback at no additional cost to you when you shop through them. This is how we keep the lights on. 


Don’t forget you can follow Lesser Places by email, or on Twitter, Tumblr, andInstagram using the menu at the top of the page. Or, you could click the links below to share with your friends directly. Or, copy and paste the URL someplace you think people will find it useful. Or, print the story, place it in a nice envelope, and send it to one of your friends. Basically we support any way you want to share.  No, we aren’t above begging.


39082_966963051231_919342_n

Max Wilson is a graduate student studying ecology at Arizona State University. He writes here at Lesser Places, occasionally for Backpacker.com, and even more occasionally for scientific journals. You can follow him on twitter @maxomillions.

14 thoughts on “The Arc’teryx Bora Mid One Million Step Review: 731,174 Step Update

  1. A brilliant review. I did choose the Bora 2 but wouldn’t use them in camp for the reasons you mention. Arctetyx have certainly come up with something new. The Bora’s are an amazing boot, and fantastically comfortably even from the box. I wanted to purchase the simpler Bora in Redwood with red liner nut they don’t seem to do them anymore in the UK. Still that’s just me being finicky! So will purchase with black liner and have a a back up pair as I love them so much. Again, thankyou for the review and pictures

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks so much, Gabriel!

      I’m not sure why they haven’t come out with a billion different liners all in different colors– seems like an easy way to make a buck. On the upside, with two pairs you ought to be set for years!

      Thanks again.

      Like

  2. Hi,

    First of all congratulations for such an amazing review!

    I have contacted Arc’teryx and they confirmed me that they won’t be making a Non-Gore-Tex liner because of contractual obligation with the Gore-Tex brand. For them to have Gore-Tex written on the boot, every liner needs to be Gore-Tex…

    Congratulations and thank you!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. still following your review til’ you reach the million steps! the boots is really awesome, you were right that the longer you wear it the more it molds and wrap around your feet. No questions about it, but the best hiking shoe i’ve ever owned. looking forward to the next update! cheers max!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Great review. Thank you. I am seriously thinking about purchasing the Bora2. I eagerly followed the link to the $199 Bora boots and they are like $280 now. I thought for a second I could do what you suggested and buy two pairs of bora boots for the price of Bora2’s. The cross season ability is what appeals to me and also hoping that the sweat and leaked water will dry quicker from the removable liners. As Sturka noted, once Gortex waterproof boots get wet they DON’T dry out fast.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi there–

      Thanks for reading!

      I’m not sure why the price has jumped back to MSRP recently– they had been under $200 for almost the entire year. As a matter of fact, one of my buddies bought a pair with free darn tough socks for that price less than a month ago. Maybe the Christmas rush pushed the price up?

      I’d believe that the removable liners would dry faster once out of the boots. I’m not sure how useful this would be in the field though. If you carry a spare to change into you’d be carrying an extra pound of liners with you all the time and presumably whatever rain or snow got your feet wet in the first place would still be ongoing (and continuing to soak your “drying” liners!). Maybe if you had one nasty stream crossing to deal with this would work? Or if you had enough time to camp to really set them out?

      The real solution here is for Arc to release a non-GoreTex liner, but somehow we haven’t gotten them to do that yet…

      That being said, if you need insulated boots the 2s are a good option. Do be warned that at $95 the insulated liners are pretty pricy.

      I hope this helps! Thanks again for reading.
      Max

      Like

      1. Thanks for the detailed response Max. As far as drying the liners, I have read that people have put them down at the bottom of their sleeping bags overnight? I will keep and eye out for better deals. I am glad to hear that the prices were well below MSRP a while back. Right now neither the Bora and Bora2 are budging from MSRP so maybe you are right that it is Christmas pressure. I am doing a lot of research as I plan to do part of the PCT next year to get in shape for my real love- off trail bushwacking.
        Joel Horn

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s